5 Cosgrove K. et al. Evolving knowledge of sex differences in brain structure, function, and chemistry // Biological Psychiatry, Oct. 2007, Vol. 62, Issue 8, 847–855.
6 McDaniel M. Big-brained people are smarter: A meta-anal-ysis of the relationship between in vivo brain volume and intelligence // Intelligence, July 2005, Vol. 33, Issue 4, 337–346.
7 Сайт, посвященный поиску удивительных корреляций: http://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations Neurosci-ence / Edited by Dale Purves et al. – 3rd ed. Sinauer Associates, inc. 2004. Sunderland.
8 Pelvig D. et al. Neocortical glial cell numbers in human brains // Neurobiology of Aging, 2008, Vol. 29, 1754–1762.
9 Luders E. et al. Gender differences in cortical complexity // Nature Neuroscience, Aug. 2004, Vol. 7(8), 799–800.
10 Haier R. et al. The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: sex matters // Neuroimage, Mar. 2005, Vol. 25(1), 320–327.
11 Colom R. et al. Negligible sex differences in general intelligence // Intelligence, Feb. 2000, Vol. 28, Issue 1, 57–68.
12 Jackson D. and Rushton P. Males have greater g: Sex differences in general mental ability from 100,000 17– to 18-year-olds on the Scholastic Assessment Test // Intelligence, Sep. 2006, Vol. 34, Issue 5, 479–486.
13 Keith T. et al. Sex differences in latent cognitive abilities ages 6 to 59: Evidence from the Woodcock – Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities // Intelligence, Nov. 2008, Vol. 36, Issue 6, 502–525.
14 Lynn R. and Irwing P. Sex differences on the progressive matrices: a meta-analysis // Intelligence, Sep. 2004, Vol. 32, Issue 5, 481–498.
15 Woollett K. and Maguire E. Acquiring “the Knowledge” of London’s Layout Drives Structural Brain Changes // Current Biology, Dec. 2011, Vol. 21, Issue 24, 2109–2114.
16 Draganski B. et al. Neuroplasticity: changes in grey matter induced by training // Nature, Jan. 2004, Vol. 427, 311–312.
17 Boyke J. et al. Training-Induced Brain Structure Changes in the Elderly // The Journal of Neuroscience, July 2008, Vol. 28(28), 7031–7035.
18 Schlaug G. The brain of musicians. A model for functional and structural adaptation // Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, June 2001, Vol. 930, The biological foundations of music, 281–299.
19 Feng J. et al. Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition // Psychological Science, 2007 Oct., Vol. 18(10), 850–855.
20 Moe A. Are males always better than females in mental rotation? Exploring a gender belief explanation // Learning and Individual Differences, 2009, Vol. 19, 21–27.
21 Massa L. et al. Individual differences in gender role beliefs infuence spatial ability test performance // Learning and Individual Differences, 2005, Vol. 15, 99–111.
22 Moss-Racusin C. et al. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, Oct. 2012, Vol. 109(41), 16474–9.
23 Williams W. and Ceci S. National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, Apr. 2015, Vol. 112, No. 17, 5360–5365.
24 Оценка гендерного разрыва в оплате труда от OECD: http://www.oecd.org/gender/data/genderwagegap.htm
25 Отчет об уровне гендерного неравенства от Международного экономического форума: http://www3. weforum.org/docs/GGGR14/GGGR_CompleteReport_2014. pdf
26 Correll S. et al. Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? // American Journal of Sociology, Mar. 2007, Vol. 112, No. 5, 1297–1138.
27 O’Neill J. and O’Neill D. What do wage differentials tell us about labor market discrimination? // NBER Working Paper, No. 11240, Apr. 2005. http://www.nber.org/papers/w11240.
Глава 11. “Пропаганда сделает вашего сына геем!”
1 Adams H. et al. Is homophobia associated with homosexual arousal? // Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Aug. 1996, Vol. 105(3), 440–445.
2 Parrot D. et al. Homophobia: Personality and attitudinal correlates // Personality and Individual Differences, May 2002, Vol. 32, Issue 7, 1269–1278.
3 DeHaan C. et al. Parental autonomy support and discrepancies between implicit and explicit sexual identities: dynamics of self-acceptance and defense // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012 Apr., Vol. 102(4), 815–832.
4 Verweij K. et al. Genetic and environmental infuences on individual differences in attitudes toward homosexuality: An Australian twin study // Behavior Genetics, 2008, Vol. 38, 257–265.
5 Smith S. et al. The effects of contact on sexual prejudice: a meta-analysis // Sex Roles, Aug. 2009, Vol. 61, Issue 3–4, 178–191.
6 Kendler K. et al. Sexual orientation in a U.S. national sample of twin and nontwin sibling pairs // American Journal of Psychiatry, Nov. 2000, Vol. 157(11), 1843–1846.
7 Michael B. et al. Genetic and environmental infuenc-es on sexual orientation and its correlates in an Australian twin sample // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Mar. 2000, Vol. 78(3), 524–536.
8 Langstrom N. et al. Genetic and environmental effects on same-sex sexual behavior: a population study of twins in Sweden // Archives of Sexual Behavior, Feb. 2010, Vol. 39(1), 75–80.
9 Hamer D. et al. A linkage between DNA markers on the X chromosome and male sexual orientation // Science, July 1993, Vol. 16, 261(5119), 321–327.
10 Sanders A. et al. Genome-wide scan demonstrates significant linkage for male sexual orientation // Psychological Medicine, 2015 May, Vol. 45(7), 1379–1388.
11 Camperio Ciani A. and Pellizzari E. Fecundity of paternal and maternal non-parental female relatives of homosexual and heterosexual men // PLoS One, 2012, Vol. 7(12), e51088.
12 Ward I. Prenatal stress feminizes and demasculinizes the behavior of males // Science, Jan. 1972, Vol. 175, No. 4017, 82–84.
13 Кузнецова Е. и др. Влияние стресса в пренатальный период на половое возбуждение и половую ориентацию самцов мышей // Российский физиологический журнал им. Сеченова, 2006, т. 92, № 1, с. 123–132.
14 Popova N. et al. Prenatal stress and ethanol exposure produces inversion of sexual partner preference in mice // Neuro-science Letters, Feb. 2011, Vol. 489, Issue 1, 48–52.
15 Dörner G. et al. Prenatal stress as possible aetiogenetic factor of homosexuality in human males // Endokrinolo-gie, 1980 June, Vol. 75(3), 365–368.
16 Schmidt G. and Clement U. Does peace prevent homosexuality? // Journal of Homosexuality, 1995, Vol. 28, 3–4, 269–275.
17 Ellis L. and Cole-Harding S. The effects of prenatal stress, and of prenatal alcohol and nicotine exposure, on human sexual orientation // Physiology & Behavior, Sep. 2001, Vol. 74, Issues 1–2, 1–15, 213–226.
18 Mårtensson J. et al. Growth of language-related brain areas after foreign language learning // Neuroimage, Oct. 2012, Vol. 63, Issue 1, 240–244.
19 Kanai R. et al. Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults // Current Biology, Apr. 2011, Vol. 21, Issue 8, 677–680.
20 Bao A.-M. and Swaab D. Sexual differentiation of the human brain: Relation to gender identity, sexual orientation and neuropsychiatric disorders // Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 2011, Vol. 32, 214–226.
21 LeVay S. A difference in hypothalamic structure between heterosexual and homosexual men // Science, Aug. 1991, Vol. 253, No. 5023, 1034–1037.
22 Byne W. et al. The interstitial nuclei of the human anterior hypothalamus: An investigation of variation with sex, sexual orientation, and HIV status // Hormones and Behavior, Sep. 2001, Vol. 40, Issue 2, 86–92.
23 Roselli C. and Stormshak F. Prenatal programming of sexual partner preference: The ram model // Journal of Neuroendocrinology, Mar. 2009, Vol. 21(4), 359–364.
24 Alekseyenko O. et al. Bilateral damage to the sexually dimorphic medial preoptic area/anterior hypothalamus of male ferrets causes a female-typical preference for and a hypo-thalamic Fos response to male body odors // Physiology and Behavior, Feb. 2007, 28, Vol. 90(2–3), 438–449.
25 Serovich J. et al. A systematic review of the research base on sexual reorientation therapies // Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, Apr. 2008, Vol. 34(2), 227–238.
26 Haldeman D. The practice and ethics of sexual orientation conversion therapy // Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Apr. 1994, Vol. 62(2), 221–227.
27 Blanchard R. Fraternal birth order and the maternal immune hypothesis of male homosexuality // Hormones and Behavior, Sep. 2001, Vol. 40, Issue 2, 105–114.
28 Savic I. and Lindstrom P. PET and MRI show differences in cerebral asymmetry and functional connectivity between homo– and heterosexual subjects // PNAS, July 2008, Vol. 105, No. 27, 9403–9408.
29 Berglund H. et al. Brain response to putative phero-mones in lesbian women // PNAS, May 2006, Vol. 103(21): 8269–8274.
30 American Psychological Association, 2005. Lesbian and Gay Parenting. Отчет доступен по ссылке: http://www.apa.org/ pi/lgbt/resources/parenting-full.pdf
31 Rosenfeld M. Nontraditional families and childhood progress through school // Demography, Aug. 2010, Vol. 47(3), 755–775.
32 Gates G. et al. Adoption and Foster Care by Gay and Lesbian Parents in the United States. The Urban Institute; Washington, DC: 2007. Отчет доступен по ссылке: http:// williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Gates-Badgett-Macomber-Chambers-Final-Adoption-Report-Mar-2007.pdf
33 Regnerus M. How different are the adult children of parents who have same-sex relationships? Findings from the New Family Structures Study // Social Science Research, 2012, Vol. 41, 752–770.
34 Marina S. et al. Sharing motherhood: biological lesbian co-mothers, a new IVF indication // Human Reproduction, Apr. 2010, Vol. 25, Issue 4, 938–941.
35 Kono T. et al. Birth of parthenogenetic mice that can develop to adulthood // Nature, Apr. 2004, Vol. 428, 860–864.
36 Deng J. M. et al. Generation of Viable Male and Female Mice from Tw o Fathers // Biology of Reproduction, 2011 Mar., Vol. 84(3), 613–618.
37 Wilkins J & Haig D. What good is genomic imprinting: the function of parent-specifc gene expression // Nature Reviews Genetics, May 2003, Vo l. 4, 359–368.
Глава 12. “Если Бога нет, то все позволено”
1 Windhager S. et al. Face to face. The perception of automotive designs // Human Nature, 2008 Dec., Vol. 19(4), 331–346.
2 Windhager S. et al. “Cars have their own faces”: cross-cultural ratings of car shapes in biological (stereotypical) terms // Evolution & Human Behavior, Mar. 2012, Vol. 33, Issue 2, 109–120.
3 Bateson M. et al. Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting // Biology. Letters, Sep. 2006, Vol. 22, Issue 2(3), 412–414.
4 Rigdon M. et al. Minimal social cues in the dictator game // Journal of Economic Psychology, June 2009, Vol. 30, Issue 3, 358–367.
5 Bekkers R. and Schuyt T. And who is your neighbor? Explaining denominational differences in charitable giving and volunteering in the Netherlands // Review of Religious Research, Sep. 2008, Vol. 50, No. 1, 74–96.
6 Wang L. and Graddy E. Social capital, volunteering, and charitable giving // International Journal of Voluntary and Nonproft Organizations, Mar. 2008, Vol. 19, Issue 1, 23–42.
7 Bekkers R. Measuring altruistic behavior in surveys: the all-or-nothing dictator game // Survey Research Methods, 2007, Vol. 1, No. 3, 139–144.
8 Malhotra D. (When) are religious people nicer? Religious salience and the “Sunday Effect” on pro-social behavior // Judgment and Decision Making, April 2010, Vol. 5, No. 2, 138–143.
9 Shariff A. and Norenzayan A. God is watching you. Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game // Psychological Science, 2007 Sep., Vol. 18(9), 803–809.
10 Sosis R. and Bressler E. Cooperation and commune longevity: a test of the costly signaling theory of religion // Cross-Cultural Research, May 2003, Vol. 37, No. 2, 211–239.
11 Ginges J. et al. Religion and support for suicide attacks // Psychological Science, Feb. 2009, Vol. 20, No. 2, 224–230.
12 Blogowska J. et al. Religious prosociality and aggression: it’s real // Journal for the Scientifc Study of Religion, Sep. 2013, Vol. 52, Issue 3, 524–536.
13 Bartal I. et al. Helping a cagemate in need: empathy and pro-social behavior in rats // Science, Dec. 2011, Vol. 9; No. 334(6061), 1427–1430.
14 Langford D. et al. Social modulation of pain as evidence for empathy in mice // Science, June 2006, Vol. 312, No. 5782, 1967–1970.
15 Brosnan S. and de Waal F. Monkeys reject unequal pay // Nature, Sep. 2003, Vol. 425, 297–299.
16 Hamlin K. and Wynn K. Young infants prefer proso-cial to antisocial others // Cognitive Development, Jan. 2011; Vol. 26(1), 30–39.
17 Hamlin K. et al. How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others // PNAS, Dec. 2011, Vol. 108, No. 50, 19931–19936.
18 Hamlin K. et al. Not like me = bad: Infants prefer those who harm dissimilar others // Psychological Science, Apr. 2013; Vol. 24(4), 589–594.
19 Silveira L. Experimenting with spirituality: analyzing the God Gene in a nonmajors laboratory course // CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008 Spring; 7(1): 132–145.
20 St-Pierre L. and Persinger M. Experimental facilitation of the sensed presence is predicted by the specifc patterns of the applied magnetic felds, not by suggestibility: Re-analyses of 19 experiments // International Journal of Neuroscience, 116: 1079–1096, 2006.
